Breach of Confidence: Improper Use of Business Information Including Trade Secrets | Legacy Legal Services


Last Updated: August 23 2026

Question:Can a business sue for misuse of confidential business recipes or processes under Ontario breach of confidence rules?

Answer:Yes, in Ontario you can pursue a breach of confidence claim where the information has the necessary quality of confidence, was communicated in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence, and was then misused to the detriment of the disclosing party, as described in Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574.   A licensing or “access” arrangement (for example, recipes, proprietary software, manufacturing processes, or marketing systems) can still lead to liability if the recipient uses the information beyond the permitted scope or after termination.   If you are dealing with suspected misuse, Legacy Legal Services can help legal professionals and businesses quickly assess facts, identify the right claim strategy, and document next steps, call (226) 246-3825 for support in Ontario.

Add this website to Google Preferred Sources


Misused Business Secrets

The success of a business may rely heavily upon secret recipes, proprietary software, unique systems, and customized processes; and accordingly, information relating to these key aspects may be highly valued with misuse of such confidential information quite harmful. In tort law, breach of confidence involves the wrongful use of information that was openly shared with the party that subsequently misuses the secretive information; and in this respect, breach of confidence differs from theft of trade secrets which would involve an element of misappropriation.

Note: Please contact Legacy Legal Services by phone at: (226) 246-3825 to discuss any specific questions that you may have.

The Law

Per the Supreme Court in the case of Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574, the elements requiring proof so to constitute a breach of confidence case are:

  • The information conveyed was confidential;
  • The information was communicated in confidence; and
  • The information was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.

Specifically, per Lac Minerals Ltd., the Supreme Court said:


I can deal quite briefly with the breach of confidence issue.  I have already indicated that Lac breached a duty of confidence owed to Corona.  The test for whether there has been a breach of confidence is not seriously disputed by the parties.  It consists in establishing three elements:  that the information conveyed was confidential, that it was communicated in confidence, and that it was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.  In Coco v. A. N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd., [1969] R.P.C. 41 (Ch.), Megarry J.  (as he then was) put it as follows at p. 47:

In my judgment, three elements are normally required if, apart from contract, a case of breach of confidence is to succeed.  First, the information itself, in the words of Lord Greene, M.R. in the Saltman case on page 215, must "have the necessary quality of confidence about it."  Secondly, that information must have been imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence.  Thirdly, there must be an unauthorized use of that information to the detriment of the party communicating it . .  .

As a particularly interesting example case, Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods Ltd., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 142 involved the licensing of the recipe for Clamato juice by Duffy-Mott (a company later acquired by Cadbury Schweppes Inc.) to Caesar Canning who then contracted production to FBI Foods Ltd.  After Cadbury Schweppes acquired Duffy-Mott, Caesar Canning was notified of termination of the licensing agreement; however, FBI, who later acquired assets of Caesar Canning, made use of the recipe despite a lack of authorization to do so.

Conclusion

Improper use of secretive information may constitute as the tort of breach of confidence where information was confidential, information was communicated within a confidential context, and the information was then misused by the party that received the communication.

At
Our Desk Now!
Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

NOTE: Do not send confidential information through the web form.  Use the web form only for your introduction.   Learn Why?
5

NOTE: A considerable amount of searches featuring “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” frequently indicate a pressing demand for capable legal assistance rather than a particular designation.  In Ontario, licensed paralegals are under the regulation of the same Law Society that supervises lawyers and have the authority to represent clients in specified litigation cases.  Skills in advocacy, legal analysis, and procedure are pivotal to that function.  Legacy Legal Services provides legal representation within its licensed framework, focusing on strategic positioning, preparation of evidence, and compelling advocacy aimed at securing efficient and beneficial outcomes for clients.

AR, BN, CA+|EN, DT, ES, FA, FR, GU, HE, HI
IT, KO, PA, PT, RU, TA, TL, UK, UR, VI, ZH
Send a Message to: Legacy Legal Services

NOTE: Do not send confidential details about your case.  Using this website does not establish a legal-representative/client relationship.  Use the website for your introduction with Legacy Legal Services. 
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address is: 18.97.9.174
Legacy Legal Services

2557 Dougall Avenue, Suite 1
Windsor, Ontario,
N8X 1T5

P: (226) 246-3825
E: contact@legacyparalegal.ca

Ask for Appointment

Business Hours:

09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
Monday:
Tuesday:
Wednesday:
Thursday:
Friday:

By appointment only.  Call for details.
Messages may be left anytime.

Application Hosted on Microsoft Azure Cloud Web Servers | Analytics by Google
Let’s Encrypt SSL certificate is a service provided by the Internet Security Research Group (ISRG)
All names, logos and/or trademarks are those of their respective owners.

This webpage was served on: October 15 2026 at 03:55:02AM Eastern.

.









Assistive Controls:  |   |  A A A