Yes No Share to Facebook
Limiting Laundry Access:
Disruptive Changes to Use of Laundry Facilities
Last Updated: July 06 2026
Question: 1) What can I do if my landlord interferes with my reasonable access to laundry facilities in Ontario?
Answer: 2) If you are in Ontario and your landlord changes laundry access in a way that interferes with your reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit, Legacy Legal Services can help you assess whether the change may be improper and what steps to take before or alongside a Landlord and Tenant Board application, including documenting the lease term, the exact access restrictions, and the practical impact on your household routine. In JD v. LD'S, 2017 CanLII 28729, the Landlord and Tenant Board found a landlord’s move to restrict laundry access to a limited fixed time significantly interfered with the tenant’s reasonable enjoyment and ordered a laundry cost compensation plus a rent abatement. For a quick case assessment and to discuss your options, call (226) 246-3825 and speak with a licensed legal professional at Legacy Legal Services serving tenants across Ontario.
Decision Summary: JD v. LD'S, CET-63203-16 (Re)
The case of JD v. LD'S, 2017 CanLII 28729, provides an important decision from the Landlord and Tenant Board regarding the improper interference or disruption with the use of laundry facilities by the landlord. The legal dispute between the landlord and the tenant arose after the landlord attempted to alter laundry facilities access despite that the lease agreement expressly stated that the tenant, JG, could access the laundry facilities twice per week by contacting the upstairs tenants. The landlord, despite the twice per week term within the lease agreement, attempted to impose a condition that access to the laundry facilities be limted to a three-hour period, once per week, and only on Sunday.
Factual Details
In June 2016, new tenants moved upstairs. Subsequently, LD's restricted laundry access to Sundays between 11:00AM and 2:00PM. As JG worked in construction and needed to do laundry regularly, JG faced difficulties with the new schedule and needed to use a laundromat to supplement the unilaterally imposed once-a-week laundry access.
Decision Reasons
The Landlord Tenant Board found that the change in laundry arrangements significantly interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the property by the tenant. The shift to a fixed time on Sundays for laundry use represented a substantial interference compared to the previous arrangement without any time restrictions. While the Landlord Tenant Board acknowledged that the landlord was imposing the laundry access restrictions for the purpose of mediating tensions between tenants, the Landlord Tenant Board ruled in favour of JG.
Remedy Granted
The Landlord Tenant Board granted $200.00 for laundry costs as compensation to the tenant. Additionally, the Landlord Tenant Board awarded a rent abatement of ten percent per month for six months to the tenant.
Full Case
The official case judgment is available here: JD v. LD's, 2017 CanLII 28729
Conclusion
This decision in this case shows that even when a landlord is imposing a change in access to amenities for the purpose of relieving tensions between tenants, the imposition remains as an interference in the rights of the tenant.
NOTE: A considerable amount of searches featuring “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” frequently indicate a pressing demand for capable legal assistance rather than a particular designation. In Ontario, licensed paralegals are under the regulation of the same Law Society that supervises lawyers and have the authority to represent clients in specified litigation cases. Skills in advocacy, legal analysis, and procedure are pivotal to that function. Legacy Legal Services provides legal representation within its licensed framework, focusing on strategic positioning, preparation of evidence, and compelling advocacy aimed at securing efficient and beneficial outcomes for clients.

